This is the mail archive of the
archer@sourceware.org
mailing list for the Archer project.
Re: DW_TAG_imported_declaration DW_TAG_base_type w/o DW_AT_name [Re: using directive patch]
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Sami Wagiaalla <swagiaal at redhat dot com>, Project Archer <archer at sourceware dot org>, Dodji Seketeli <dseketel at redhat dot com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:42:24 -0600
- Subject: Re: DW_TAG_imported_declaration DW_TAG_base_type w/o DW_AT_name [Re: using directive patch]
- References: <48BED230.1070209@redhat.com><20080907183612.GA7304@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net><20080918211335.GA24936@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net><4A37B667.10307@redhat.com> <m34oug2gen.fsf@fleche.redhat.com><48BED230.1070209@redhat.com><20080907183612.GA7304@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net><20080918211335.GA24936@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net><4A37B667.10307@redhat.com><20090616203743.GA12904@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net>
- Reply-to: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
Jan> DW_AT_name present at this DIE?
Jan> DW_TAG_imported_declaration DW_TAG_base_type
Jan> A (invalid) anonymous anonymous
Jan> B (standard import) anonymous present
Jan> C (unhandled now) present anonymous
Jan> D (renamed import) present present
Thanks for this. I see I was not fully understanding the code.
That comment should explain the failing case more clearly, like this.
Tom