Re: [expr-cumulative] RFA: fix explicit operator parsing

[Sami Wagiaalla <swagiaal at redhat dot com>]

On 01/27/2010 01:22 PM, Tom Tromey wrote:
> While looking at a bug I found that expr-cumulative does not handle one
> case of explicit calls to an operator:
>
>      (gdb) p operator==(s1,s2)
>      A syntax error in expression, near `operator==(s1,s2)'.
>
> The bug is that the name_not_typename production does not handle
> operator.
>
> This patch fixes the problem and adds a couple new test cases -- one for
> the bug and one for an explicit call to an operator as a member
> function; I couldn't find one of these in the test suite.
>
> Built and regtested on x86-64 (compile farm).
> Ok?

Yes, please commit.