This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: binutils for TI Cxx
- To: Ian Lance Taylor <ian at zembu dot com>
- Subject: Re: binutils for TI Cxx
- From: Joel Sherrill <joel dot sherrill at OARcorp dot com>
- Date: Thu, 09 Dec 1999 16:17:53 -0600
- CC: binutils at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- Organization: OAR Corporation
- References: <384FB767.FADFBCD9@OARcorp.com> <19991209143724.21038.qmail@daffy.airs.com>
- Reply-To: joel dot sherrill at OARcorp dot com
Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
> Date: Thu, 09 Dec 1999 08:06:31 -0600
> From: Joel Sherrill <joel.sherrill@OARcorp.com>
>
> Does anyone know the status of the binutils support for the
> TI C3x and C4x in either 2.9.1 or the development snapshots?
>
> The development snapshots includes TI C3x support, using COFF or
> a.out. This was contributed by Steve Haworth. I don't think I have
> patches for TI C4x. I don't know how different the chips are.
I think they are similar although like all CPU variants, instructions
always differ. :)
I guess I can email Steve and see how this relates to the patch on
the gcc_c40 web site.
Thanks.
> I don't think there is any gcc support for either chip in the main
> tree.
Actually the c4x is merged although according to the web site
of Michael Hayes who did the port, it does not include "aggressive
optimizations". He distributes a patch for that part.
I need to check on the gdb support also. There is a cycle accurate
simulator
for this CPU.
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
joel@OARcorp.com On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256) 722-9985