This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: output order of input sections not named in linker script


> I don't know.  I'm certainly open to the possibility that the linker
> behaviour should be changed.  The current behaviour is meant to
> implement reasonable defaults.  This is useful for ELF, because code
> like glibc uses lots of random section names which do not occur in
> typical linker scripts.

I don't have a problem with the current behavior, and I am happy with the
specification being placement according to section attributes with no
reliable ordering within that.  I was just trying to figure out what the
guarantee (or lack thereof) in fact is, and bring up the apparent
documentation inconsistency.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]