This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: AIX4.3.2: problem with 64-bit .o's
- To: "Bleser, Pascal" <PBleser at atos-group dot com>
- Subject: Re: AIX4.3.2: problem with 64-bit .o's
- From: Clinton Popetz <cpopetz at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 09:58:58 -0600
- Cc: "'bu'" <binutils at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>, "Engel, Christian" <CEngel at atos-group dot com>, "Zimmermann, Armin" <AZimmermann at atos-group dot com>
- References: <0996A78792B1D3118E2400508B5F12381F0C41@exchange-ac.ikossvan.de>
On Thu, Mar 23, 2000 at 01:51:24PM +0100, Bleser, Pascal wrote:
> Now ar works (with binutils 2.9.1, the new "big format" archives
> were not supported), but nm complains about not recognizing 64-bit
> object files (all those *_64.o-files) - it rather looks like warnings,
> because nm goes on and works properly for 32-bit obj-files.
> But after having a look at the bfd code for RS6000, it looks like
> 64-bit-objs *are* supported (yes, I've also tried building the bfd
> with --enable-64bit-bfd: it didn't help :( )...
XCOFF64 isn't currently supported by bfd. But, coincidently, I'll be sending
patches to support it within the next week. The work is almost done; I'm
dealing with a few loose ends.
-Clint