This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Suggest re-generating CVS bfd-in2.h


Hello,

I'm seeing the difference:

diff -p -r1.40 bfd-in2.h
*** bfd-in2.h   2000/04/08 00:10:49     1.40
--- bfd-in2.h   2000/04/19 06:15:24
*************** typedef struct sec
*** 1058,1066 ****
  #define SEC_SHARED 0x4000000
  
          /* When a section with this flag is being linked, then if the
size of
!            the input section is less than a page, it should not cross
a page
!            boundary.  If the size of the input section is one page or
more, it
!            should be aligned on a page boundary.  */
  #define SEC_BLOCK 0x8000000
  
          /* Conditionally link this section; do not link if there are
no
--- 1058,1066 ----
  #define SEC_SHARED 0x4000000
  
          /* When a section with this flag is being linked, then if the
size of
!           the input section is less than a page, it should not cross a
page
!           boundary.  If the size of the input section is one page or
more, it
!           should be aligned on a page boundary.  */
  #define SEC_BLOCK 0x8000000
  
          /* Conditionally link this section; do not link if there are
no

when re-generating this file using maintainer-mode + gmake headers.
While in the noise, perhaphs a re-generate wouldn't hurt.  binutils-N.NN
branch?

	enjoy,
		Andrew

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]