This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: New ABI demangler support in binutils
- To: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- Subject: Re: New ABI demangler support in binutils
- From: Ken Block <block at zk3 dot dec dot com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 15:16:43 -0400
- Cc: Nick Clifton <nickc at cygnus dot com>, binutils at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- References: <200006151809.LAA18701@elmo.cygnus.com> <20000615120653.A21455@lucon.org>
Everything would probably be best, but the following is the minimum you can take
for the demangler:
libiberty/Makefile.in
libiberty/cplus-dem.c
libiberty/cp-demangle.c (new)
libiberty/dyn-string.c (new)
libiberty/sort.c (new)
include/demangle.h
include/sort.h (new)
include/dyn-string.h (new)
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2000 at 11:09:47AM -0700, Nick Clifton wrote:
> > Hi H.J.
> >
> > : > The demangler support for the new API is available in the libiberty that
> > : > comes with GCC, but does not seem to be available in binutils. How does
> > : > one go about getting demangler support for the new ABI in binutils? How
> > : > is libiberty kept in sync between GCC, gdb, and binutils?
> > : >
> > :
> > : Someone has to sync it.
> >
> > Correct, althpough there are (tentative) plans to merge the gcc abnd
> > binutils repositories at some point in the future.
> >
> > : Nick, should I give it a try?
> >
> > Please do.
> >
>
> Should I sync the whole libiberty or just the demangler? I prefer
> the whole libiberty since there are quite a few files for demangler
> in libiberty and I don't know if they will work right without other
> changes.
>
> H.J.