This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: gas/config/tc-sparc.c broken
- To: kazu at hxi dot com
- Subject: Re: gas/config/tc-sparc.c broken
- From: Nick Clifton <nickc at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2000 11:41:46 -0700
- CC: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Hi Kazu,
: As far as formatting fixes, would a comparison of disassembly output
: combined with visual inspection count as testing? I thought about
: comparing the object code side, but that's too weak, I guess.
The best way is to perform a 'before-and-after' comparison of the
relevant testsuite results. (ie GAS testsuite for GAS changes, GCC
testsuite for GCC changes, etc)
Of course this takes up time and disk space. Quite a lot of time and
disk space for some toolchains, so you can do a couple of things to
optimise the process:
* If you are making GAS changes then you do not need the compiler,
so you can avoid building it (and all the libraries).
* You can perform the after test(s) first. If there are no failures
at all, then there is no need to check the before results.
Cheers
Nick