This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [Proposed binutils PATCH] Re: Diagnosing an intricate C++ problem

* H . J . Lu (hjl@lucon.org) [20000905 17:45]:

> Why not xxxBSD just spend some effort to make sure the main trunck is
> working for you?

You seem to completely ignore the way *BSD trees are built/updated. There
are some people that object to tracking moving targets, i.e. CVS versions.
Not all the world is Linux.

And IMHO even a good part of the Linux world would appreciate having only
one source for binutils.

Philipp

-- 
Philipp Thomas <pthomas@suse.de>
Development, SuSE GmbH, Schanzaecker Str. 10, D-90443 Nuremberg, Germany

#define NINODE  50              /* number of in core inodes */
#define NPROC   30              /* max number of processes */
 	-- Version 7 UNIX for PDP 11, /usr/include/sys/param.h
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]