This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: some weirdness/slippage on RTEMS targets
- To: joel dot sherrill at OARcorp dot com
- Subject: Re: some weirdness/slippage on RTEMS targets
- From: Philip Blundell <philb at gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2001 19:54:09 +0000
- cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- References: <3A843B13.89A0A3D1@OARcorp.com>
>object formats since binutils since 2.10. Specifically
>m68k-rtems and i386-rtems are supposed to be ELF and
>were so in binutils 2.10. In the CVS source I checked
>out a couple of days ago, they are back to coff
>per config.bfd, ld/configure.tgt, and gas/configure.in.
>
>Is this an issue that the RTEMS patches that changed
>most default formats to elf are actually on the binutils
>2.10 branch?
I would guess the patch was accidentally applied only to the 2.10 branch,
maybe because the person checking it in thought it was already on the mainline.
"cvs log" should reveal the truth of the matter.
p.