This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: PATCH: Warning for unknown PE section flags.

To: hjl at valinux dot com
Subject: Re: PATCH: Warning for unknown PE section flags.
From: DJ Delorie <dj at delorie dot com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 14:42:55 -0500
CC: bgp at dumballah dot tvnet dot hu, binutils at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
References: <3A930B1C.C09E2996@pop.tvnet.hu> <20010220163852.B31792@valinux.com> <3A93FD43.D59EF642@pop.tvnet.hu> <20010221102339.A18613@valinux.com> <200102211928.OAA14244@envy.delorie.com> <20010221113849.A20017@valinux.com>


I'm mostly worried about ld linking in objects with unknown section
flags.  Ignoring them may not be a good idea then.  The other programs
can certainly ignore them, although objdump should print them
somewhere if it doesn't already.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PATCH: Warning for unknown PE section flags.
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: PATCH: Warning for unknown PE section flags.
  - From: Nick Clifton

References:
- PATCH: Warning for unknown PE section flags.
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: PATCH: Warning for unknown PE section flags.
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: PATCH: Warning for unknown PE section flags.
  - From: H . J . Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]