This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: redefined symbols on weak binding
- To: Alan Modra <alan at linuxcare dot com dot au>
- Subject: Re: redefined symbols on weak binding
- From: Eric Christopher <echristo at redhat dot com>
- Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2001 23:47:52 -0700
- CC: luca dot spinacci at marconicomms dot com, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0104041726280.13605-100000@front.linuxcare.com.au>
Alan Modra wrote:
>
> On Wed, 4 Apr 2001 luca.spinacci@marconicomms.com wrote:
>
> > The diab linker supports weak binded symbols. So do I get redefinition of
> > __t12basic_string3ZcZt18string_char_traits1ZcZt24__default_alloc_template2b0i0
> > symbol?
>
> What is a "diab linker"? Sounds like it doesn't really support weak
> symbols, or does so in an incompatible way. It seems to me you should be
> complaining to your linker vendor.
Diab Data is a company that provides tools for compiling code for
various embedded systems. That would be their linker of course. I've
seen incompatabilities in the past between gcc compiled things and diab
linkers, and vice versa.
-eric
--
I will not dissect things unless instructed