This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Fix for emulparms/elf
"H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 11:37:08AM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> >
> > I've committed the appended patch to synch the bfd and ld files.
> >
> > Andreas
> >
> > 2001-04-30 Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de>
> >
> > * emulparms/elf_x86_64.sh (MAXPAGESIZE): Fix value.
> >
> >
> > ============================================================
> > Index: ld/emulparams/elf_x86_64.sh
> > --- ld/emulparams/elf_x86_64.sh 2000/11/30 19:30:33 1.1
> > +++ ld/emulparams/elf_x86_64.sh 2001/04/30 09:35:52
> > @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
> > ELFSIZE=64
> > OUTPUT_FORMAT="elf64-x86-64"
> > TEXT_START_ADDR=0x1000
> > -MAXPAGESIZE=0x1000
> > +MAXPAGESIZE=0x100000
> > NONPAGED_TEXT_START_ADDR=0x1000
> > ARCH=i386
> > MACHINE=
> >
>
> It looks very strang to me. It seems that TEXT_START_ADDR and
> NONPAGED_TEXT_START_ADDR may be to set to non-page boundary.
I'll change this soon to an address that's greater than MAXPAGESIZE.
AFAIK it can be on a non-page boundary, compare e.g. armnbsd.sh.
What's a good value for the TEXT_START_ADDR constants? What should I
consider in setting the value?
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger
SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
private aj@arthur.inka.de
http://www.suse.de/~aj