This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: "Fix" strip test failure
"H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 10:46:18PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> >
> > Running the testsuite on i686-linux with glibc 2.2 gives the following
> > error:
> > /builds/sourceware-src/build-binutils-ln/binutils/strip-new tmpdir/testprog.o
> > Executing on host: /builds/sourceware-src/build-binutils-ln/binutils/strip-new tmpdir/testprog.o (timeout = 300)
> > bucomm.o: In function `make_tempname':
> > /cvs/binutils-gdb-ln/binutils/bucomm.c:246: the use of `mktemp' is dangerous, better use `mkstemp'
> > bucomm.o: In function `make_tempname':
> > /cvs/binutils-gdb-ln/binutils/bucomm.c:246: the use of `mktemp' is dangerous, better use `mkstemp'
> >
> > FAIL: strip
> >
> > The problem is that libtool rebuilds strip and thereby emits this
> > warning :-(.
> >
> > You can check this problem if you run the testsuite twice in the
> > binutils directory. The first time it will fail for ld, the second
> > time not.
> >
> > What do you think of the appended patch? Or is there a better
> > solution?
> >
>
> My Linux binutils has no problems. I have fixed it long time ago:
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2000-10/msg00047.html
>
> But my patch was not accepted :-(.
Alexandre,
you mentioned in
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2000-10/msg00082.html:
> (Which doesn't mean I'm discarding your patch; I'll keep it handy and
> check in it in my next slot of time devoted to libtool, unless you've
> come up with something along the lines I suggest above :-)
Is libtool fixed? Will libtool 1.4 work without problems?
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger
SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
private aj@arthur.inka.de
http://www.suse.de/~aj