This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: What changed in ld?

To: Andrew Haley <aph at cambridge dot redhat dot com>
Subject: Re: What changed in ld?
From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 12:02:36 -0700
Cc: "G. Adam Stanislav" <adam at whizkidtech dot net>,binutils at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
References: <3.0.6.32.20010601125028.00aa9330@mail85.pair.com> <3.0.6.32.20010601132812.00e7eaf0@mail85.pair.com> <15127.58289.756724.448115@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com>

On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 07:49:21PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> 
> Read the NASM page.  It says:
> 
> http://www.web-sites.co.uk/nasm/bugs.html
> 
> "Relocations between multiple code segments in ELF are wrong. NASM's
> ELF files don't conform to the ELF standard properly. "
> 
>  > What can I do?
> 
> I would have thought it would be a good time to fix nasm.

FWIW, I have fixed all the nasm ELF bugs which I can reproduce.


H.J.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: What changed in ld?
  - From: G. Adam Stanislav

References:
- What changed in ld?
  - From: G. Adam Stanislav
- Re: What changed in ld?
  - From: G. Adam Stanislav
- Re: What changed in ld?
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]