This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Should we remove those man pages from CVS?
- To: Stephane Carrez <Stephane dot Carrez at worldnet dot fr>
- Subject: Re: Should we remove those man pages from CVS?
- From: "David O'Brien" <obrien at FreeBSD dot org>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 16:02:22 -0700
- Cc: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>, Nick Clifton <nickc at cambridge dot redhat dot com>, binutils at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- Organization: The NUXI BSD group
- References: <20010616093504.B2742@lucon.org> <m3ae371mas.fsf@north-pole.nickc.cambridge.redhat.com> <20010617120315.A2587@lucon.org> <20010625111426.A99064@dragon.nuxi.com> <3B379DA7.8238ACF0@worldnet.fr>
- Reply-To: obrien at FreeBSD dot org
On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 10:23:03PM +0200, Stephane Carrez wrote:
> > The resulting manpages have a nit in them:
> >
> > OBJCOPY.1(1) GNU OBJCOPY.1(1)
> >
> > the ".1" should not be there. They also product a fully blank last page
> > on BSD.
>
> Too bad....
??
> For ".1", it's my fault (:- The additional .1 comes from the Makefile rule:
Will you be commiting a fix to this, or should I do it post-USENIX?
> The man pages are generated with pod2man. You might contact Russ who
> maintains that tool: Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu>
Will do. Thanks.
--
-- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)