This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: PATCH: More mips3264 support
- To: cgd at broadcom dot com
- Subject: Re: PATCH: More mips3264 support
- From: Eric Christopher <echristo at redhat dot com>
- Date: 03 Aug 2001 19:25:18 +0100
- Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- References: <995717531.23476.24.camel@ghostwheel.cygnus.com><mailpost.995714090.17770@postal.sibyte.com><yov51yn83kbn.fsf@highland.sibyte.com><996576470.3729.49.camel@ghostwheel.cygnus.com> <yov5vgk580nz.fsf@highland.sibyte.com>
>
> Not sure what this means in terms of changes to the source.
Not a whole lot really. It's a name change, but it'll allow a hierarchy
for configure as well, e.g.
mipsisa32-*-elf
mipsisa32<weird chip>-*-elf
mipsisa64<weird chip>-*-elf
etc.
>
> If you plan to keep the bfd_mach_mipsisa32 & bfd_mach_mipsisa64
> constant names, i suggest you do the same for bfd_mach_mipsisa5, and
> nuke the bfd_mach_mips{32,64}. Shouldn't need both sets, since the
> latter are meant to describe the ISAs rather than particular
> processors.
>
I kept meaning to ask.. what is bfd_mach_mips5 supposed to be for? I've
only seen 1-4...
>
> > Anyhow, I'll produce another set for you and Nick to comment on as soon
> > as I'm able to remerge all of my changes.
>
> Great! 8-)
>
You'll see 'em today. :)
-eric
--
Look out behind you!