This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: PATCH: Fix bfd.c (Re: Tracking down a build breakage)
- To: Nick Clifton <nickc at cambridge dot redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: PATCH: Fix bfd.c (Re: Tracking down a build breakage)
- From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at bitrange dot com>
- Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2001 07:48:47 -0400 (EDT)
- cc: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>, Kazu Hirata <kazu at hxi dot com>, <binutils at sources dot redhat dot com>
On 11 Aug 2001, Nick Clifton wrote:
> > But my bfd_sprintf_vma/bfd_fprintf_vma change does break any BFD
> > which doesn't include elf.lo. It seems to me that we should only
> > check bfd_target_elf_flavour when elf is configured in BFD. Here
> > is a patch. Any comments?
>
> Ooops - I discovered this and checked in a different patch to fix
> this, without actually checking the mailing lists first. Sorry!
I don't think this is fully fixed. Please consider building
h8300-hms and i960-coff. They don't built at the moment
complaining that (mind the wrapped lines):
gcc -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -g -O2 -o
size size.o bucomm.o version.o filemode.o ../bfd/.libs/libbfd.a
\
../libiberty/libiberty.a
../bfd/.libs/libbfd.a(bfd.o): In function `bfd_sprintf_vma':
/home/hp/cvs_areas/combined/cvs_write/bfd/bfd.c:1273: undefined
reference to `bfd_elf_sprintf_vma'
../bfd/.libs/libbfd.a(bfd.o): In function `bfd_fprintf_vma':
/home/hp/cvs_areas/combined/cvs_write/bfd/bfd.c:1285: undefined
reference to `bfd_elf_fprintf_vma'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[3]: *** [size] Error 1
I haven't looked into it further than this.
brgds, H-P