This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: binutils patches for Cirrus/arm9e/maverick support
- To: Nick Clifton <nickc at cambridge dot redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: binutils patches for Cirrus/arm9e/maverick support
- From: philb at gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2001 18:08:13 +0100
- cc: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>, binutils <binutils at sources dot redhat dot com>
In message <m3wv246b8t.fsf@north-pole.nickc.cambridge.redhat.com>, Nick Clifton
writes:
>Anyway Maverick is a much better name, so I suggest that other than
>for backwrds compatibility, we use "Maverick" instead of "arm9e" in the
>future. Agreed ?
Good plan. Not only is "Maverick" far cooler-sounding than "arm9e", it
seems less likely to be confused with ARM's own ARM9E product family.
p.