This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: binutils patches for Cirrus/arm9e/maverick support
- To: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: binutils patches for Cirrus/arm9e/maverick support
- From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 16:06:30 +0100
- cc: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com, Nick Clifton <nickc at cambridge dot redhat dot com>, binutils <binutils at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Organization: ARM Ltd.
- Reply-To: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com
>
> > But, from reading the code, I'm sure if you put in
> >
> > cfmvsr r0, mvf5
> > or
> > cfmvsr mvdx0, r1
> > or
> > cfmvsr dspsc, r0
> >
> > or a number of other invalid operations, then the assembler will fail to
> > diagnose the mistake.
>
> well, since you are rewriting
> the code there's no sense in me fixing it in the current sources right?
True, provided I can work out what is supposed to be correct and what
isn't. Without the specs it's going to be much more work than I'd planned
for, which is going to delay me feeding back my changes... :-(
R.