This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: More i386 architectures?

To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
Subject: Re: More i386 architectures?
From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 13:43:53 -0800
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
References: <3BEDD545.9000302@cygnus.com> <20011113125655.A16148@redhat.com> <3BF18FAA.3060304@cygnus.com>

[Get raw message]

On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 04:24:58PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> Sorry you've lost me here.  I'm refering to a data structure provided by 
> BFD and used by GDB to identify architectures and architecture variants.

What I meant is that getting bfd to return a bitmask would be
healthier than enumerating every ia32-compatible cpu ever produced.
Not that we're really set up to do that, but I suppose it could
be emulated with clever choices of enumeration codes.

r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: More i386 architectures?
  - From: Andrew Cagney

References:
- More i386 architectures?
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: More i386 architectures?
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: More i386 architectures?
  - From: Andrew Cagney

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]