This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Can non-libiberty includes be moved out of include/ ?

To: obrien at FreeBSD dot org
Subject: Re: Can non-libiberty includes be moved out of include/ ?
From: DJ Delorie <dj at delorie dot com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 18:22:29 -0500
Cc: hjl at lucon dot org, binutils at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
References: <20011113135246.A71808@dragon.nuxi.com> <20011113135551.A4053@lucon.org> <20011113152056.B91163@dragon.nuxi.com>

[Get raw message]


> > It is trivial to do. My cross toolchain has binutils, gcc and gdb. I
> > only need to type
> 
> Specifically how have you set this up?

This is unofficial, but one of the sources.redhat.com folks set up an
"uberbaum" repository that is the merge of gcc+src (using symlinks).

cvs -d :pserver:anoncvs@sources.redhat.com:/cvs/uberbaum get .

This is what I build every night.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Can non-libiberty includes be moved out of include/ ?
  - From: Hans-Peter Nilsson

References:
- Can non-libiberty includes be moved out of include/ ?
  - From: David O'Brien
- Re: Can non-libiberty includes be moved out of include/ ?
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: Can non-libiberty includes be moved out of include/ ?
  - From: David O'Brien

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]