This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Is the current ld brolen? (Re: ld is broken on Linux/alpha)

On Sat, Nov 24, 2001 at 01:18:21AM -0800, H . J . Lu wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 24, 2001 at 10:08:57AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 24, 2001 at 12:06:35AM -0800, H . J . Lu wrote:
> > > Now I got those while building glibc 2.2.4 on Linux/x86? Jakub, have
> > > you tried your patch with RedHat build? Something is going on.
> > 
> > I just did did make check and some testing on small testcases I had.
> > I'll bootstrap gcc and glibc on Monday.
> > 
> 
> Please make sure there are no regressions with "make check" on gcc and
> glibc. BTW, I don't know if checking on gcc and glibc will be enough
> to catch all possible problems.

Strange thing is that on Linux/x86 glibc 2.2.4 bootstrapped just fine with
ld which has my SHF_MERGE/STT_SECTION patch in.
I'm still running make check, will see if that makes a difference somewhere.

	Jakub
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]