This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [PATCH] Add support for x86_64-*-netbsd* target
- From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
- To: DJ Delorie <dj at delorie dot com>
- Cc: aj at suse dot de, thorpej at wasabisystems dot com,binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2002 12:15:26 -0500
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add support for x86_64-*-netbsd* target
- References: <20011229122954.F2892@dr-evil.shagadelic.org> <u8heq2pmjc.fsf@gromit.moeb> <200201041402.g04E2NP11917@envy.delorie.com>
> I looked over them as x86-64 maintainer I looked over them and they're
>> fine.
>>
>> But I fear that the configure part is "outside of the immediate domain
>> that" I maintain (see binutils/MAINTAINERS) and I can't give a formal
>> approval. But I'll volunteer to commit this if somebody else oks it
>> since you don't have CVS access AFAIK.
>
>
> For gcc, a target maintainer also maintains the target-specific code
> in the configury. I see no reason to do it differently here.
Well, for GDB. There is explicitly _no_ maintainer - anyone can mess
around with the configury (provided they are brave enough). The
rationale is that configury is so magical that, in the end, we have to
suck it and see. Post it, if no one objects, commit it :-)
enjoy,
Andrew