This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: --target=mipsisa32 linker error

From: "H Girard" <hgirard at broadbandnetdevices dot com>
To: <binutils at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 16:27:54 -0500
Subject: Re: --target=mipsisa32 linker error
Organization: Bnd Radiocom
References: <001501c1ae8c$76d80e90$0300a8c0@sympatico.ca><1012945657.29231.93.camel@ghostwheel.cygnus.com> <008a01c1af1f$85a032c0$0300a8c0@sympatico.ca> <1013030479.19162.9.camel@ghostwheel.cygnus.com>
Reply-to: "H Girard" <hgirard at broadbandnetdevices dot com>

the version found today : binutils-020206 does not generate the error by the
linker ?!
I will use that one to build the gcc crosscompiler
thank you

Henri Girard
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric Christopher" <echristo@redhat.com>
To: "H Girard" <hgirard@broadbandnetdevices.com>
Cc: <binutils@sources.redhat.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 4:21 PM
Subject: Re: --target=mipsisa32 linker error


> On Wed, 2002-02-06 at 07:04, H Girard wrote:
> > should it matter which gcc is used to compile binutils : I believe the
one
> > in the cygwin is a 2.95.? .
>
> No, it shouldn't matter. It appears to just be a bug in binutils.
>
> -eric
>
> --
> I will not use abbrev.
>
>

References:
- --target=mipsisa32 linker error
  - From: H Girard
- Re: --target=mipsisa32 linker error
  - From: Eric Christopher
- Re: --target=mipsisa32 linker error
  - From: H Girard
- Re: --target=mipsisa32 linker error
  - From: Eric Christopher

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]