This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Should we depreciate GASP ?

From: Nick Clifton <nickc at cambridge dot redhat dot com>
To: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: 13 Feb 2002 08:35:11 +0000
Subject: Should we depreciate GASP ?

Hi Guys,

  As pointed out by Ian Taylor and Ben Elliston, GASP is no longer
  needed as all of its functionality has been incorporated into GAS.

  I am suggesting that we mark GASP as deprecated in the current
  mainline, and after the next release of binutils (2.13) we remove it
  altogether.

  Comments ?

Cheers
        Nick

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Should we depreciate GASP ?
  - From: Eric Christopher
- Re: Should we depreciate GASP ?
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]