This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [PATCH] Re: Symbol versioning in C++ (two ld bugs)
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 09:17:06PM +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> Phil Edwards <phil@jaj.com> writes:
>
> > This has been bootstrapped nightly for the last couple of nights on
>
> Did it pass binutils's testsuite?
...knew I was forgetting to mention something... I rode the short bus to
testsuite school...
=== binutils Summary ===
# of expected passes 31
# of expected failures 1
=== ld Summary ===
# of expected passes 125
# of expected failures 13
# of untested testcases 5
/home/pme/build/build-2002-02-13/ld/ld-new 20020210
> Just one more question: Do you expect to depend on this for GCC 3.1?
I think so, yes. (Benjamin?)
Phil
--
If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater
than the animating contest for freedom, go home and leave us in peace. We seek
not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you;
and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen. - Samuel Adams