This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Committed, SH: bfd bits for sh64 on sh-*, shl-* ELF targets. Fix opcodes too.

On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 06:44:39PM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Feb 10, 2002, Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com> wrote:
> 
> > I think this should go on the 2.12 branch too or alternatively,
> > Alexandre's opcodes patch should be reverted there.  Either way
> > would make sh-elf compile.
> 
> > opcodes:
> > 	* configure.in <bfd_sh_arc>: For sh-* and shl-*, enable sh64
> > 	support only for sh-*-*elf*, shl-*-*elf*, sh-*-linux* and
> > 	shl-*-linux*.
> > 	* configure: Regenerate.
> 
> > bfd:
> > 	* config.bfd (sh-*-linux*, sh-*-elf* | sh-*-rtemself*): Add sh64
> > 	vectors.
> > 	(sh-*-netbsdelf*): New, to trump sh*-*-netbsdelf* and add sh64
> > 	vectors.
> 
> I'm installing this in the branch, since it's broken right now.  I
> don't have a problem with reverting the patches later, but it clearly
> can't stay the way it is for too long, and going forward is surely
> going to be preferred for GDB.  Dan, please let me know if you'd
> rather have both patches reverted.

No, this is fine.  Thanks.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]