This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: inline asm problem

From: DJ Delorie <dj at delorie dot com>
To: twisti at fusion dot at
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 16:21:18 -0500
Subject: Re: inline asm problem
References: <Pine.BSF.4.30.0203180726560.47794-100000@dair.pair.com><1016473026.29345.11.camel@sector17.home.at> <200203181746.g2IHkKF07729@envy.delorie.com><1016475201.30243.15.camel@sector17.home.at> <200203181816.g2IIGnO07978@envy.delorie.com><1016478213.5128.8.camel@sector17.home.at> <200203181910.g2IJAYI08402@envy.delorie.com> <1016486313.1396.5.camel@sector17.home.at>


> But i haven't found this documented. Or am i overlooking something...

IMHO you're just trying too hard to work around what gcc is trying to
do for you ;-)

References:
- Re: inline asm problem
  - From: Hans-Peter Nilsson
- Re: inline asm problem
  - From: TWISTI
- Re: inline asm problem
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: inline asm problem
  - From: TWISTI
- Re: inline asm problem
  - From: TWISTI
- Re: inline asm problem
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: inline asm problem
  - From: TWISTI

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]