This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Elf Header sh_addr field not according to spec


>> Is there someone out there that can tell me why there is a number in the ELF
>> section header for the .debug_abbrev section and why it is important in gcc
>> 2.9 and unimportant in gcc 3.0?
>
>It was likely a binutils bug, now fixed.  Probably nothing to do with gcc,
>but you used a different version of binutils for each of your gcc versions.
>

I wasn't using binutils to see this discrepancy between what is in the
section header and what the ELF spec says should be in there.  I can see
the problem through bit dumps of the ELF executable.  Since this is not
a problem with binutils, do you know of a better place to ask my question.

Mike Sorensen



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]