This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [davem@redhat.com: Re: v8.S dwarf2 eh frame issues again :(]


On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 01:19:34PM +0200, Christian Jönsson wrote:
> Is someone here trying to look into what Dave is saying here?

Yes, I will be on Monday, provided I can reproduce it.

> ----- Forwarded message from "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com> -----
> 
> Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 02:41:47 -0700 (PDT)
> To: christian@j-son.org
> Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: v8.S dwarf2 eh frame issues again :(
> From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
> 
>    From: Christian Jönsson <christian@j-son.org>
>    Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 11:45:34 +0200
> 
>    On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 02:32:01AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
>    
>    > Not at all, java bugs are not qualified as regressions that can hold
>    > up 3.1 being released.
>    
>    OK, is this issue constrained to java or might it have broader impact?
> 
> The v8.S libffi issue is constrained to java.
> 
> The dwarf unwind info misoptimization in binutils can impact any
> platform, but that is a binutils bug in eh_frame optimization and
> should not hold up the 3.1 gcc release.
> 
> ----- End forwarded message -----

	Jakub


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]