This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: want a,m,s,w,x when building gcc-3.1

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Ralf Corsepius <corsepiu at faw dot uni-ulm dot de>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, Binutils List <binutils at sources dot redhat dot com>, GCC List <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Joel Sherrill <joel dot sherrill at OARcorp dot com>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 17:25:33 -0700
Subject: Re: want a,m,s,w,x when building gcc-3.1
References: <1019891869.31177.1900.camel@mccallum> <20020427203129.I32482@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <1019974933.10889.3516.camel@mccallum>

On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 08:25:59AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> 3.1 Using the same prefix for gcc as for binutils.
> No problems, building finishes correctly.

This is correct.

> 3.2 Using a different prefix for gcc as for binutils:

This isn't.  What you are trying to do is at odds with 
how gcc-as-a-cross-compiler expects to work.

I.e. working as designed and not a bug per-se.

r~

References:
- want a,m,s,w,x when building gcc-3.1
  - From: Ralf Corsepius
- Re: want a,m,s,w,x when building gcc-3.1
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: want a,m,s,w,x when building gcc-3.1
  - From: Ralf Corsepius

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]