This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: bfd.h installation location
On May 11, 2002, Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
> On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 05:15:38PM -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
>> Today I noticed that bfd.h gets installed under $prefix/include instead
> I question whether we should be installing any of these files by
> default.
My thought exactly.
However, even if we don't install them by default, an explicitly
requested install should still install them in an appropriate place.
> Which projects using libbfd don't provide their own copy of bfd?
None I'm aware of.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer