This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: just a little nitpik in bfd


On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 06:02:44PM +0100, Nick Clifton wrote:
> Hi H.J.
> 
> > If you believe you didn't introduce any new bugs, check it in. I
> > will fix the testcases if necessary. I know it can be quite tricky.
> 
> Well there were 6 new failures in all (vers 6 & 15, ELF weak data
> first, last, first common & last common) which I felt were too many
> to ignore.
> 
> If you like though, try applying this patch and then see if you can
> fix up the failures.  I would love to know why changing the hashing
> algorithm is affecting the tests though.  I would have thought that
> the algorithm was completely hidden inside BFD.
> 

I don't believe your change is correct. I think the same hashing
algorithm is used in several places in binutils. Please do

# find -type f | xargs grep "<<[ \t]*17"

in binutils.


H.J.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]