This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Extra section for MIPS_STABS_ELF

From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
To: Eric Christopher <echristo at redhat dot com>
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 22:31:38 -0700
Subject: Re: Extra section for MIPS_STABS_ELF
References: <20020614191128.A21459@lucon.org> <1024197307.29697.3.camel@ghostwheel.cygnus.com>

On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 08:15:03PM -0700, Eric Christopher wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-06-14 at 19:11, H . J . Lu wrote:
> > With the current binutils, I got an extra section, .debug_line, for
> > MIPS_STABS_ELF. This patch
> > 
> > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2002-06/msg00358.html
> > 
> > should fix it. Eric, could you please take a look at it?
> > 
> 
> It is generic code, so no.
> 

BTW, I just noticed that alpha has the same problem.


H.J.

References:
- Extra section for MIPS_STABS_ELF
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: Extra section for MIPS_STABS_ELF
  - From: Eric Christopher

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]