This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: FW: gprof license

From: Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com>
To: cgd at broadcom dot com
Cc: nickc at redhat dot com, "Federico G. Schwindt" <fgsch at olimpo dot com dot br>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: 22 Jul 2002 09:51:39 -0700
Subject: Re: FW: gprof license
References: <20020716131937.GB25263@deedlit><m3n0sql8yr.fsf@north-pole.nickc.cambridge.redhat.com><20020717195612.GA25263@deedlit><m31ya0xgtk.fsf@north-pole.nickc.cambridge.redhat.com><mailpost.1027336854.10384@news-sj1-1> <yov5lm837lye.fsf@broadcom.com>

cgd@broadcom.com writes:

> At Mon, 22 Jul 2002 11:20:54 +0000 (UTC), "Nick Clifton" wrote:
> > OK, so a patch like this, applied to all the relevant files, would be
> > OK then ?
> 
> Has UC ever given a blanket OK for replacing the old-style license
> with the new style?

That is my understanding.  See
    ftp://ftp.cs.berkeley.edu/pub/4bsd/README.Impt.License.Change

Ian

References:
- FW: gprof license
  - From: Federico G. Schwindt
- Re: FW: gprof license
  - From: Nick Clifton
- Re: FW: gprof license
  - From: Federico G. Schwindt
- Re: FW: gprof license
  - From: Nick Clifton
- Re: FW: gprof license
  - From: cgd

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]