This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] MIPS bfd: n32 ABI support

From: Eric Christopher <echristo at redhat dot com>
To: Thiemo Seufer <ica2_ts at csv dot ica dot uni-stuttgart dot de>
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: 24 Jul 2002 13:52:09 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS bfd: n32 ABI support
References: <20020719213323.GH397@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de><1027468038.1346.255.camel@ghostwheel.cygnus.com><20020724175654.GW397@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de><1027540163.2200.9.camel@ghostwheel.cygnus.com> <20020724202859.GA397@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de>

On Wed, 2002-07-24 at 13:28, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Eric Christopher wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > I left it out as well as the other (GNU defined) PC relative
> > > relocations except of BFD_RELOC16_PCREL. I can't see why NewABI
> > > should have use for it.
> > 
> > I was building gcc with your changes yesterday and it was needed.
> 
> Where exactly was it needed, and in which configuration?

Um. I can't really say yet :)

> BFD_RELOC_32_PCREL aka R_MIPS_PC32 is AFAICS not a valid NewABI
> relocation.

Hrm. Some work will likely need to be done then. I could use a good
pointer to an ABI doc though.

-eric

-- 
I don't want a pony, I want a rocket
powered jetpack!

References:
- [PATCH] MIPS bfd: n32 ABI support
  - From: Thiemo Seufer
- Re: [PATCH] MIPS bfd: n32 ABI support
  - From: Eric Christopher
- Re: [PATCH] MIPS bfd: n32 ABI support
  - From: Thiemo Seufer
- Re: [PATCH] MIPS bfd: n32 ABI support
  - From: Eric Christopher
- Re: [PATCH] MIPS bfd: n32 ABI support
  - From: Thiemo Seufer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]