This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: MIPS gas is broken now.

From: cgd at broadcom dot com
To: ica2_ts at csv dot ica dot uni-stuttgart dot de
Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro at ds2 dot pg dot gda dot pl>,"H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>,binutils at sources dot redhat dot com,"Eric Christopher" <echristo at redhat dot com>
Date: 03 Sep 2002 10:40:56 -0700
Subject: Re: MIPS gas is broken now.
References: <20020902141758.GC4194@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de><Pine.GSO.3.96.1020902172058.27143K-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl><20020902162031.GD4194@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de><mailpost.1030983642.10673@news-sj1-1>

At Mon, 2 Sep 2002 16:20:42 +0000 (UTC), "Thiemo Seufer" wrote:
> > (or any other tests for non-disabled code, actually).
> 
> Maybe embedded PIC should be disabled for targets which have no
> use for it.

That would be fine with me.

However, if people are going to go down this road, I'd like to say
that I think people making "mips-linux specific" changes should always
test mips-elf (or other generic mips embedded targets) as well, since
in the past the former have caused a lot of breakage in the latter.

(That's why i like having the empic tests there all the time.  ... if
you don't want them there and don't want the code, that's fine... but
you can't skip the testing.  8-)

cgd

Follow-Ups:
- Re: MIPS gas is broken now.
  - From: Eric Christopher

References:
- Re: MIPS gas is broken now.
  - From: Thiemo Seufer
- Re: MIPS gas is broken now.
  - From: Maciej W. Rozycki
- Re: MIPS gas is broken now.
  - From: Thiemo Seufer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]