This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: A little horror story on toolchain requirements

From: Denis Vlasenko <vda at port dot imtp dot ilyichevsk dot odessa dot ua>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 20:17:59 -0200
Subject: Re: A little horror story on toolchain requirements
References: <200210091652.g99GqHp30853@Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> <20021009170047.GA19716@nevyn.them.org>
Reply-to: vda at port dot imtp dot ilyichevsk dot odessa dot ua

On 9 October 2002 15:00, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > Googling again... OUCH! I need newer binutils to be able
> > to compile newer binutils!!!   8-%
> >
> > I hope compiling newer binutils with _old_ (3.0.3) gcc will work
> > ;-)
>
> Binutils builds with just about anything.  That looks like you
> installed the GCC 3.2 you built as your system compiler; you should
> probably have read the installation notes first to find the binutils
> requirement...

"Binutils builds with just about anything, you should read the
installation notes first to find the binutils requirement"
sounds a bit contradictory to me :-)

Don't worry, I can switch back to gcc 3.0.3 real easy.
Will test it today at home.
--
vda

Follow-Ups:
- Re: A little horror story on toolchain requirements
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

References:
- A little horror story on toolchain requirements
  - From: Denis Vlasenko
- Re: A little horror story on toolchain requirements
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]