This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH/RFA] SH TLS support (Revised)

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: kaz Kojima <kkojima at rr dot iij4u dot or dot jp>
Cc: hp at bitrange dot com, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 10:43:18 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFA] SH TLS support (Revised)
References: <Pine.BSF.4.44.0210081629540.40570-100000@dair.pair.com> <200210090838.g998clO15483@r-rr.iij4u.or.jp>

On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 05:16:48PM +0900, kaz Kojima wrote:
> The TLS relocs should be handled as non-adjustable in
> sh_fix_adjustable. I'm not sure about sh_force_relocation.
> It seems that there is no handling in i386_force_relocation,
> right?

They should be marked in force_relocation (to make sure they
get emitted to the object file), but there's no reason to
mark them for fix_adjustable.  That reduces a private symbol
to a section-relative offset, which should work fine.

r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH/RFA] SH TLS support (Revised)
  - From: kaz Kojima

References:
- Re: [PATCH/RFA] SH TLS support (Revised)
  - From: Hans-Peter Nilsson
- Re: [PATCH/RFA] SH TLS support (Revised)
  - From: kaz Kojima

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]