This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA] libiberty warning fixes for OSX

From: DJ Delorie <dj at delorie dot com>
To: ac131313 at redhat dot com
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 21:30:55 -0500
Subject: Re: [RFA] libiberty warning fixes for OSX
References: <DEE0090A-FF87-11D6-B9B6-00039396EEB8@apple.com> <3DE0FA6F.2030605@redhat.com>

> Should the declaration be deleted?  I believe that everything now uses 
> lbasename() (well at least it did a few months ago).

I hesitate to do so, as it would create a backwards compatibility
issue.  Even if nothing *we* know of should use it (in which case, the
declaration is harmless), there may be other packages that we don't
know about that require it.

Perhaps, though, we need better protection for it.  I wish there were
a way for libiberty's configure to configure the include directory
headers also.  Sigh.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFA] libiberty warning fixes for OSX
  - From: Andrew Cagney

References:
- [RFA] libiberty warning fixes for OSX
  - From: Klee Dienes
- Re: [RFA] libiberty warning fixes for OSX
  - From: Andrew Cagney

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]