This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

RE: [Patch] skipping import libraries for performance reasons - direct auto-import of dll's



> -----Original Message-----
> From: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com
> [mailto:binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com]On Behalf Of Andrew Cagney
> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 1:08 AM
> To: Ralf Habacker
> Cc: Ian Lance Taylor; binutils@sources.redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [Patch] skipping import libraries for performance reasons -
> direct auto-import of dll's
>
>
> > <<<<< add other types depending of the directory >>>>>>>>
> >
> > # Run indent per GDB specs
> >
> > types="-T FILE `cat *.h | sed -n \
> >     -e 's/^.*[^a-z0-9_]\([a-z0-9_]*_ftype\).*$/-T \1/p' \
> >     -e 's/^.*[^a-z0-9_]\([a-z0-9_]*_func\).*$/-T \1/p' \
> >     -e 's/^typedef.*[^a-zA-Z0-9_]\([a-zA-Z0-9_]*[a-zA-Z0-9_]\);$/-T \1/p' \
> >     | sort -u`"
> >
> > ${indent} ${types} "$@"
> >
> >
> > BTW: This script need to be less stricter in recognizing proper
> indent versions because it only works with gnu indent 2.2.6
>
> That is intentional (there is a gdb bug indicating that it should be
> updated post GDB 5.3).
>
I understand.

> Indent's output has changed between releases (bugs get fixed).  If
> different versions were allowed, the code's indentation would become
> unstable.
One question: Isn't it possible to check in such an update to a newer indent
release for each source file as regular source change like any other bug fix ?

Ralf


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]