This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: configure problems: possibly undefined macro: AS_FOR_TARGET
- From: kaih at khms dot westfalen dot de (Kai Henningsen)
- To: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 20 Jan 2003 01:03:00 +0200
- Subject: Re: configure problems: possibly undefined macro: AS_FOR_TARGET
- Comment: Unsolicited commercial mail will incur an US$100 handling fee per received mail.
- Organization: Organisation? Me?! Are you kidding?
- References: <1042008003.930.4922.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.faw.uni-ulm.de>
corsepiu@faw.uni-ulm.de (Ralf Corsepius) wrote on 08.01.03 in <1042008003.930.4922.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.faw.uni-ulm.de>:
> Am Die, 2003-01-07 um 18.28 schrieb Charles Wilson:
> > > m Mon, 2003-01-06 um 22.17 schrieb Christian Jönsson:
> >
>
> > >> well, regardless, it is suggested recently on the cygwin list that
> > >> binutils or more correct I guess, the top-level configure.in to have
> > >> this patch in it
>
> > > => This patch is useless.
> >
> > You mean, in your opinion this patch is not worthy of application.
> No, I say, this patch does _not_ solve the problem of wanting
> autoconf-2.13 or autoconf-2.5x in general.
>
> > It is certainly NOT useless, since it SOLVES THE PROBLEM.
> No, not in general.
>
> It only helps out the heuristics your autoconf-wrapper is based upon and
> therefore only helps Cygwin and those others vendor which use hacked
> autoconfs or wrappers similar to yours.
I should point out that Debian also has such a wrapper (and probably all
Debian-derived distributions that do ship both versions).
Looks to me as if it's the only game in town.
MfG Kai