This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: configure problems: possibly undefined macro: AS_FOR_TARGET


corsepiu@faw.uni-ulm.de (Ralf Corsepius)  wrote on 08.01.03 in <1042008003.930.4922.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.faw.uni-ulm.de>:

> Am Die, 2003-01-07 um 18.28 schrieb Charles Wilson:
> > > m Mon, 2003-01-06 um 22.17 schrieb Christian Jönsson:
> >
>
> > >> well, regardless, it is suggested recently on the cygwin list that
> > >> binutils or more correct I guess, the top-level configure.in to have
> > >> this patch in it
>
> > > => This patch is useless.
> >
> > You mean, in your opinion this patch is not worthy of application.
> No, I say, this patch does _not_ solve the problem of wanting
> autoconf-2.13 or autoconf-2.5x in general.
>
> >  It is certainly NOT useless, since it SOLVES THE PROBLEM.
> No, not in general.
>
> It only helps out the heuristics your autoconf-wrapper is based upon and
> therefore only helps Cygwin and those others vendor which use hacked
> autoconfs or wrappers similar to yours.

I should point out that Debian also has such a wrapper (and probably all  
Debian-derived distributions that do ship both versions).

Looks to me as if it's the only game in town.

MfG Kai


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]