This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Results for binutils 2.13.90 20030202 testsuite on sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
- From: Christian Jönsson <c dot christian dot joensson at telia dot com>
- To: binutils <binutils at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 17:12:15 +0100
- Subject: Results for binutils 2.13.90 20030202 testsuite on sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
This was on a Aurora SPARC Linux 1.0 (Ansel) SS20 dual SuperSparc-(II)
sun4m system with these packages:
binutils 2.13.90 20030122 sparc-linux
Bison-1.35-1
dejagnu-1.4.2-10
expect-5.32.2-67
3.4 20030122 (experimental) sparc-linux
glibc-2.2.5-42
glibc64-2.2.5-42
kernel-2.4.20-2.3sparcsmp
tcl-8.3.3-67
In-tree joined gcc and binutils cvs trunks.
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Feb 2 13:38:34 UTC 2003
Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== binutils tests ===
Running target unix
=== binutils Summary ===
# of expected passes 31
# of expected failures 1
=== gas tests ===
Running target unix
=== gas Summary ===
# of expected passes 51
=== ld tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: TLS -fpic -shared transitions
FAIL: TLS -fpic and -fno-pic exec transitions
FAIL: TLS -fno-pic -shared
=== ld Summary ===
# of expected passes 147
# of unexpected failures 3
# of expected failures 14
version: binutils 2.13.90 20030202
Platform: sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
configure flags: sparc-linux --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-binutils --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix
Counting all warnings,
there are 19 warnings in stage0 of this bootstrap.
Number of warnings per file:
10 libiberty/regex.c
2 /usr/local/src/gcc-binutils/trunk/src/readline/histexpand.c
2 include/xregex2.h
1 /usr/local/src/gcc-binutils/trunk/src/readline/display.c
1 /usr/local/src/gcc-binutils/trunk/src/readline/bind.c
1 lex.yy.c
1 eelf64_sparc.c
1 eelf32_sparc.c
Number of warning types:
8 signed and unsigned type in conditional expression
2 unused parameter \`???'
2 passing arg ??? of \`???' discards qualifiers from pointer target type
2 ISO C90 does not support \`static' or type qualifiers in parameter array declarators
2 function declaration isn't a prototype
2 comparison is always true due to limited range of data type
1 \`???' defined but not used