This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Confusing meaning of --no-undefined

From: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>
To: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Cc: Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>, Jan Vroonhof <jan dot vroonhof at insignia dot com>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 15:00:50 +1030
Subject: Re: Confusing meaning of --no-undefined
References: <3E3F786C.1000403@de.bosch.com> <m3ptq8l1ma.fsf@workshop.nickc.cambridge.redhat.com> <g3r8ao45fh.fsf_-_@bart.isltd.insignia.com> <m3y94miv22.fsf@workshop.nickc.cambridge.redhat.com> <20030212033534.GJ23622@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <20030211195436.A23975@lucon.org>

On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 07:54:36PM -0800, H. J. Lu wrote:
> Does "ld --shared -Bsymbolic --no-undefined" work with the change? See

Should do.  It probably makes sense to turn on no_undefined with
-Bsymbolic.

-- 
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre

References:
- no-warn-mismatch on different arm-linux-ld
  - From: Dirk Behme
- Re: no-warn-mismatch on different arm-linux-ld
  - From: Nick Clifton
- Confusing meaning of --no-undefined
  - From: Jan Vroonhof
- Re: Confusing meaning of --no-undefined
  - From: Nick Clifton
- Re: Confusing meaning of --no-undefined
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: Confusing meaning of --no-undefined
  - From: H. J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]