This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: MIPS empic failures?

From: Eric Christopher <echristo at redhat dot com>
To: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>
Cc: cgd at broadcom dot com, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: 14 Feb 2003 15:15:48 -0800
Subject: Re: MIPS empic failures?
References: <yov5adgzd9t0.fsf@broadcom.com><1045180275.1078.40.camel@ghostwheel.ges.redhat.com> <20030214032839.GX23622@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au>

> The question is whether mips really needs a special
> TC_FORCE_RELOCATION_SUB_SAME, or whether the testcase just needs
> adjusting for fewer relocs.  I think the latter is correct, but I'm
> no MIPS expert.
> 

Yes, I believe so.

Chris: since you're the (only) empic user ;)

-eric

-- 
guess, feel, botch, puzzle, try again,
and try to remember what you did.

References:
- MIPS empic failures?
  - From: cgd
- Re: MIPS empic failures?
  - From: Eric Christopher
- Re: MIPS empic failures?
  - From: Alan Modra

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]