This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: The Linux binutils 2.13.90.0.18 is rleased
On Tue, Feb 18, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 01:57:59AM +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 08, Olaf Hering wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Feb 08, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 07:53:01PM +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
> > > > > > I have no problems with x86. It seems that PPC is broken. Alan, what
> > > > > > do you get on PPC?
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, something is broken on ppc32.
> > > > > I tried glibc CVS from 20021215 (also with binutils 2.13.90.0.10) and it
> > > > > has the same make check failure.
> > > > > I wonder how glibc ever passed make check in the last 6 weeks...
> > > >
> > > > Probably depends on the compiler, because it passes for me just fine
> > > > (both with binutils 2.13.90.0.16 and 2.13.90.0.18, gcc-3_2-rhl8-branch
> > > > in both cases).
> > >
> > > I have tried 3.2 and 3.2.2. It seems I have to investigate now.
> >
> > Yes, glibc make check passes with gcc-3_2-rhl8-branch but not with
> > gcc-3_2-branch.
> > I found nothing obvious in the diff. What part does fix it?
>
> I haven't looked at any diffs redhat might be using, but try this:
>
> * sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc32/sysdep.h (HIDDEN_JUMPTARGET): Redefine.
Yes, that one fixes it. Thanks!
Gruss Olaf
--
A: No.
Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?