This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [rfa] `struct _bfd' -> `struct bfd'
- From: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>
- To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
- Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 11:47:52 +1030
- Subject: Re: [rfa] `struct _bfd' -> `struct bfd'
- References: <3E59C04D.3040304@redhat.com>
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 01:48:45AM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> (_bfd): Define for backward compatibility.
Do we really need this? Seems like you can update gdb and sim in
tandem with the rest of your change. Other users of bfd will just
need a small and fairly obvious change if they happen to use
struct _bfd, _and_ want to use a new libbfd.
--
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre