Re: [RFC] windres' -I option

["Dimitrie O. Paun" <dimi at intelliware dot ca>]

On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 09:40:55AM -0500, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
> >On March 20, 2003 03:51 am, Nick Clifton wrote:
> >[Chris, I didn't receive your message, please Cc: me as I'm not
> > on the binutil list...]
> 
> Um... Why?  Asking people to cc is going to be error prone.

'Cause I'm on linux-kernel and wine-*? :) Not a problem, I'll try 
to subscribe...

> >ChangeLog
> >  Rename the -I option to -J. Introduce -I as synonym for --include-dir.
> 
> I meant to mention that this is not a valid ChangeLog.  Take a look
> at the entries in the binutils ChangeLog and you'll see that this isn't
> even close to the correct format.

Fine, here it is again (sorry, you guys have different format from what
we use in the Wine comunity):

ChangeLog
	Dimitrie O. Paun <dpaun at rogers dot com>
	* windres.c:  Rename the -I option to -J. Introduce -I as synonym 
	for --include-dir. For backwards compatibility also support the
	old -I behaviour, but issue a deprecation warning.
	* doc/binutils.texi: Rename -I to -J. Document the new behaviour
	of the -I option.

Is this better?

> Nick, am I correct in assuming that this is now large enough and complex
> enough to require an FSF assignment?  Sigh.

I think I've signed one many years ago. But also the change is small
enough, and I herby assign the copyright to the FSF. No need to go
through the formal hassle for this small of a change I hope.

-- 
Dimi.