This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PATCH: A symbol version bug


On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 12:39:44AM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
> Alan,
>     Ugh. No wonder this is failing. The glibc cvs with the patch...
> 
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2003-05/msg00117.html
> 
> ...is failing vismain.out...
> 
> `.protected' seems to be handled correctly, good!
> &protinmod in main (0x10012aa4) != &protinmod in mod1 (0xffbcb34)
> &protitcpt in main (0x10012a64) != &protitcpt in mod3 (0xffdf944)
> &protvarinmod in main (0x100129b0) != &protitcpt in mod1 (0xffcd020)
> &protvaritcpt in main (0x100129b4) != &protvaritcpt in mod3 (0xffefd70)
> 
> One thing...I built binutils 2.14.90.0.1 with the proposed bfd-base 
> patch...
> 
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2003-05/msg00425.html
> 
> ...and since it passed make check I installed it and used it to build
> the glibc cvs plus the base patch. I'll revert to my previous
> binutils 2.14.90.0.1 without the base patch and rebuild glibc cvs
> with the base patch to make sure glibc cvs is okay.

I have no problem on Linux/x86.


H.J.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]